faerie Picnic
Wrathful Devotion: A poem
WRATHFUL DEVOTION
by Jennifer Welwood
You gave me a heart that ignites
In the passionate knowing of you,
And having burned in that heat
Is not drawn to lesser fires.
You gave me a mind that expands
To encounter your vastness,
And finds in those fathomless depths
Its own luminous nature.
You gave me a soul that won't rest
With any barrier to you,
Be it heavy and dense
Or gossamer as a veil.
You gave me an old structure
Made up of my history;
It is heavy and dense,
It is gossamer as a veil.
I meet it, allow it, explore it
And still it grinds on,
A machine that relentlessly churns out
Old patterns and tendencies.
I embrace it, dissolve it, release it --
Still it keeps reincarnating,
Rising up from some ancient template
Held deep in my bones.
I don't begrudge you your sense of humor,
Beloved trickster,
But I do wonder, now and then,
What you have in mind.
Did you make me to realize a freedom
I can't fully embody?
Do my heart and soul burn for a truth
That I can't fully live?
I commune with you in the heavens --
It's not hard to find you there;
But I need you down here,
In the marrow of my bones.
You can't turn away now -- stay here;
I will have this out with you.
You started something with me,
And now I want it finished.
Yes -- I will wrestle with you on this one,
Beloved torturer;
I will wrestle you all the way down
To the very ground
And not rest till I stand
With the soles of my feet upon you,
And not rest till I feel you infuse
My every cell.
This comes from Rob Brezsny’s Astrology Newsletter. There was something that resonated with me in this poem. Part of it is John’s questioning his experience of Love, in intimate setting, part of it is my own path to seek and find the divine in all things…
I am Love, Jeff
Photo displays
When You Wake Up Part 1
| When You Wake Up (Part 1) |
| When you wake up to the Divine Consciousness within you and your divine identity, you wake up simultaneously to the Divine Consciousness appearing as all other beings. And this is not poetry and this is not a feeling; this is a direct experience of the divine light living in and as all other beings. |
Andrew Harvey Religious scholar and teacher Student of world mystical traditions In an interview with Sharon Callahan, Animal Liberty co-founder |
When You Wake Up Part 2
| When You Wake Up (Part 2) |
| And until this realization is firm in you, you do not know who or where you are. You do not know that you are God in disguise, and you do not know that you have been born into a totally sacred, totally holy creation in which all sentient beings, from the smallest flea to the largest whale, are nothing less than God Herself. |
Andrew Harvey Religious scholar and teacher Student of world mystical traditions In an interview with Sharon Callahan, Animal Liberty co-founder |
Palin by Gloria Steinem
By Gloria Steinem
September 4, 2008
Here's the good news: Women have become so politically powerful that
even the anti-feminist right wing -- the folks with a headlock on the
Republican Party -- are trying to appease the gender gap with a
first-ever female vice president. We owe this to women -- and to many
men too -- who have picketed, gone on hunger strikes or confronted
violence at the polls so women can vote. We owe it to Shirley
Chisholm, who first took the 'white-male-only' sign off the White
House, and to Hillary Rodham Clinton, who hung in there through
ridicule and misogyny to win 18 million votes.
But here is even better news: It won't work. This isn't the first time a boss has picked an unqualified woman just because she agrees with him and opposes everything most other women want and need. Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It's about making life more fair for women everywhere. It's not about a piece of the existing pie; there are too many of us for that. It's about baking a new pie.
Selecting Sarah Palin, who was touted all summer by Rush Limbaugh, is no way to attract most women, including die-hard Clinton supporters. Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton. Her down-home, divisive and deceptive speech did nothing to cosmeticize a Republican convention that has more than twice as many male delegates as female, a presidential candidate who is owned and operated by the right wing and a platform that opposes pretty much everything Clinton's candidacy stood for -- and that Barack Obama's still does.
To vote in protest for McCain/Palin would be like saying, 'Somebody stole my shoes, so I'll amputate my legs.' This is not to beat up on Palin. I defend her right to be wrong, even on issues that matter most to me. I regret that people say she can't do the job because she has children in need of care, especially if they wouldn't say the same about a father. I get no pleasure from imagining her in the spotlight on national and foreign policy issues about which she has zerobackground, with one month to learn to compete with Sen. Joe Biden's 37 years' experience.
Palin has been honest about what she doesn't know. When asked last month about the vice presidency, she said, 'I still can't answer that question until someone answers for me: What is it exactly that the VP does every day?' When asked about Iraq, she said, 'I haven't really focused much on the war in Iraq.' She was elected governor largely because the incumbent was unpopular, and she's won over Alaskans mostly by using unprecedented oil wealth to give a $1,200 rebate to every resident. Now she is being praised by McCain's campaign as a tax cutter, despite the fact that Alaska has no state income or sales tax.
Perhaps McCain has opposed affirmative action for so long that he doesn't know it's about inviting more people to meet standards, not lowering them. Or perhaps McCain is following the Bush administration habit, as in the Justice Department, of putting a job candidate's views on 'God, guns and gays' ahead of competence. The difference is that McCain is filling a job one 72-year-old heartbeat away from the presidency.
So let's be clear: The culprit is John McCain. He may have chosen Palin out of change-envy, or a belief that women can't tell the difference between form and content, but the main motive was to please right-wing ideologues; the same ones who nixed anyone who is now or ever has been a supporter of reproductive freedom. If that were not the case, McCain could have chosen a woman who knows what a vice president does and who has thought about Iraq; someone likeTexas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison or Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine. McCain could have taken a baby step away from right-wing patriarchs who determine hisactions, right down to opposing the Violence Against Women Act.
Palin's value to those patriarchs is clear: She opposes just about every issue that women support by a majority or plurality. She believes that creationism should be taught in public schools but disbelieves global warming; she opposes gun control but supports government control of women's wombs; she opposes stem cell research but approves 'abstinence-only' programs, which increase unwanted births, sexually transmitted diseases and abortions; she tried to use taxpayers' millions for a state program to shoot wolves from the air but didn't spend enough money to fix a state school system with the lowest high-school graduation rate in the nation; she runs with a candidate who opposes the Fair Pay Act but supports $500 million in subsidies for a natural gas pipeline across Alaska; she supports drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, though even McCain has opted for the lesser evil of offshore drilling.
She is Phyllis Schlafly, only younger. I don't doubt her sincerity. As a lifetime member of the National Rifle Assn., she doesn't just support killing animals from helicopters, she does it herself. She doesn't just talk about increasing the use of fossil fuels but puts a coal-burning power plant
in her own small town. She doesn't just echo McCain's pledge to criminalize abortion by overturning Roe vs. Wade, she says that if one of her daughters were impregnated by rape or incest, she should bear the child. She not only opposes reproductive freedom as a human right but implies that it dictates abortion,without saying that it also protects the right to have a child.
So far, the major new McCain supporter that Palin has attracted is James Dobson of Focus on the Family. Of course, for Dobson, 'women are merely waiting for their husbands to assume leadership,' so he may be voting for Palin's husband. Being a hope-a-holic, however, I can see two long-term bipartisan gains from this contest. Republicans may learn they can't appeal to right-wing patriarchs and most women at the same time.
A loss in November could cause the centrist majority of Republicans to take back their party, which was the first to support the Equal Rights Amendment and should be the last to want to invite government into the wombs of women.
And American women, who suffer more because of having two full-time jobs than from any other single injustice, finally have support on a
national stage from male leaders who know that women can't be equal outside the home until men are equal in it.
Barack Obama and Joe Biden are campaigning on their belief that men should be, can be and want to be at home for their children.
This could be huge.
Gloria Steinem is an author, feminist organizer and co-founder of the Women's Media Center.
She supported Hillary Clinton and is now supporting Barack Obama.
I am so excited!!!
Dear Everyone,
Recently, I have received a flurry of emails regarding Sarah Palin. I have also been in or overheard many conversations about her, in addition to the dismaying information I've taken in from NPR or the newspaper. After a while of this, I thought: 'Wait a minute, I used to feel *excited* about this election. Now I'm feeling this awful dread….' Though it is unusual for me, I feel compelled to speak up in a wide forum and say 'Yopp!', as one small person did once in Horton Hears a Who. I apologize for the lengthiness.
Over the past few years, I have come to appreciate the profound effect focused attention can have - be it on small or large systems. However you might or might not choose to explain this, there is more evidence compiling about the truth of this and so, I want to put out a call for consciousness about where we're choosing to put our focus.
Just a few weeks ago, most of us were feeling pretty uplifted, excited, hopeful, engergized about putting Obama andBiden in the White House. That seems to have slipped away, and by now, all I am hearing about anymore is how scared people are about Palin and what> could happen to the election and our country if she's elected (along with that other guy). Many of us (me included, for a while) have> been fairly freaked out by her. She's so extreme that she's a parody of her kind - when I haven't been distressed I've been laughing. She seems like something SNL cooked up. I am not denying that she's a serious issue, or that the scary picture is a possibility - it's happened the last two elections. What I am saying is: as a collective group of engaged citizens, what do we want to focus on?
Democrats are really good at what I'll call Righteous Anxiety. If I keep talking very strongly about how frightened I am by her, somehow this will get a message across about what a real threat she is. Perhaps it's a hope that we will bring awareness to others, it will somehow be educative to…to whom?
Conservative Republicans are not self-reflective enough to have any self-doubt, or any doubt whatsoever about their agenda. This kind of let-me-tell-you-how- scared-I-am goes nowhere with the other camp. On the other hand, many of us are very willing to talk at length among ourselves about how worried we are. It becomes a kind of: 'Let me tell you how scared I am, so you can tell me how scared you are, and we can feel how affirming it is to join one another in ourscare.'
Enough! Some of our statements of fear are just our need to express ourselves. Okay, fine. I've done it too. But now she's old news. Even if more creepy information surfaces about her (and how can it not? she's pretty creepy), we already know that she's creepy. Given what I named above about attention, it actually does us no good to keep our focus on her. My only caveat is: if you happen to know specific people or groups who are undecided (such an odd idea to me), and they have some willingness to be educated, then by all means, go for it. Otherwise, we are hurting our cause, deeply.
Look around and listen to what fellow Democrats are talking about - it's almost all Palin. We are too ready to play victim to this crazy lady who's going to swoop in and lay ruin to all we've hoped for. So to this I say: 'Whoa, Nellie; not me.' I have felt the deep dismay, the anger, the dread. And now that I have noticed it, it points me to what I really want: I want Obama to win, and to win big. To whatever degree you've felt it, please remember your excitement! *That's* the word, the feeling, to focus on. It's so exciting! Wow, think of how much could change for the better! We have felt so very hopeful not> so long ago. It's all still there, if you attend to it consciously – it can resurface quickly. Let's wipe the smear of Palin off of our collective windshields and look clearly out at our excitement.
So these are my constructive ideas, if you have any interest:
1) At some point after reading this, take a minute to close your eyes and picture Wednesday, November 5th, and feel your jubilation and relief, the thrill that Obama has been elected as the 44th President of the United States of America . Picture, in sensory detail, where you hear of it, whom you're with, and how you feel. Let this feeling linger with you; savor it. Build on it. Keep coming back to it. Make yourself a DVD for your mind that you can pop in at any moment.
(Now, some of you might not feel comfortable doing this because…what if he doesn't win, and I've gone and gotten myself all hopeful? 'I don't want to feel disappointed.' Okay, but, come on, just this once, can you risk it? The stakes are pretty high. What if you allowed yourself to go all out and be crazy hopeful?)
2) If you find yourself freaked out by something else you hear about her (likely to happen to most of us), notice it, file it away or toss it out or whatever, but then take a deep breath (really - do this), and bring yourself back to 1).
3) Start calling him President Obama. People will laugh; you'll laugh too…then keep doing it. Make it a habit, of thought and of word.
4) Go to YouTube and watch part or all or any of the speeches from the Democratic National Convention. Be uplifted by it.
I, personally, will no longer read any scary Palin emails that come to me. I will politely delete them. My intention is to avoid getting worked up about her. This is not head-in-the-sand; this is intentional focus on what we really want. (Again, see caveat above if it applies to you, or if you happen to be a journalist.) Yes, I have already contributed to the website that is out there saying 'no' to Palin. But now, I am reminded that it is much more important to say YES to Obama, loudly and enthusiastically. Enough attention on her. We must stop scaring ourselves, and get back to the business of> President Obama.
If any of what I've said has seemed useful to you, please pass this on. We are capable of creating a powerful and positive movement if we can guide our attention back to our goal.
Your Fellow Citizen,
Jenny
Theater Critic, Arts Writer
Honor our elders and ancestors
John Burnside, partner of Harry Hay, an inventor of kaleidoscopes and
an important figure in the history of gay liberation, died on Sunday,
September 14th, 2008 in San Francisco, CA of complications due to
brain cancer. He was 91.
I really loved John. He lived for the past decade or so in a pretty
little house on 17th Street between Sanchez and Church in the Castro.
The house has clouds painted all over it. He and Harry Hay lived
there together until Harry died in 2002. They were watched over by a
group of Radical Faeries called the Circle of Loving Companions.
I owe my meeting with Harry and John to SF faerie David Smith who, one
day in 1999 ran into me on Castro Street and said, "Do you want to
come meet Harry Hay and John Burnside?" That was like asking me if I
wanted to meet Ethel Merman--- OF COURSE!!
So we walked over to 17th Street and met Harry and John. The thing I
remember thinking when I met them was that John had a very very sweet
personality. He was much more gentle and unassuming than Harry. And
it was clear that he had dedicated himself to Harry and Harry's work.
And that was quite a thing to be dedicated to-- because Harry Hay was
always writing and organizing and speaking and rabblerousing.
I'm thinking how lucky some of the lions of the LGBT movement were
(Barbara Gittings and her partner Kay Lahusen also come to mind) that
they had these dedicated partners who were committed to supporting
them in their activism and vision. John was obviously that way with
Harry.
After Harry died, it was a bit easier I think to see the power of John
Burnside. With Harry passed on to the ancestor world, John could
really be present to the people he was with and not have to operate as
an intermediary energy for Harry. Harry's flame took up a lot of
oxygen! And it was nice to have some years where I could sit with
John and hear about him and just see how incredibly sweet and
delightful he was.
I also bonded with John as a fellow sissy. He had a particular sissy
style that resonated with me-- gentle, cultivated, and subtly
powerful. He was one of the people who helped clarify for me the
incredibly powerful role of sissies in the world.
But John is important to gay leadership and radical faerie leadership
because he exemplified a style of leadership that often goes
unacknowledged- - a behind-the-scenes- supporter of a great public
figure. These supporters are crucial to our leadership, and yet their
contributions are often unacknowledged because they are purposefully
behind the scenes.
What would it look like to do an inventory of our behind-the-scenes
leadership, and to quantify and qualify its impact?
When I heard about John's death, I took a moment to really think about
his great spirit and his dedication to the principles of gay community
and radical faerie consciousness. I encourage each of you to do the
same-- just take in for a moment that on Sunday, September 14th, 2008
a great man transitioned from elder to ancestor. And the question
now, to each of you, is how to make him into a meaningful ancestor for
yourself and for us.
Ego and the Spirit
| The Ego and the Spirit |
| The ego looks for peace — the spirit rests in it The ego looks for love — the spirit gives it freely The ego is in constant search for happiness — the spirit is absorbed in joy The ego looks for control — the spirit is totally free The ego looks for longevity — the spirit is immortal The ego accumulates information — the spirit is Supreme Wisdom The ego is limited by space and time — the spirit is boundless The ego is only a player in a show — the spirit is life itself The ego is false — the spirit is real The ego wants more and more — the spirit has it all! |
Shortcut to Spirituality: Mastering the Art of Inner Peace Bob Gottfried Pages 118-119 |
"Now" Palin poll
what it's worth seems easy enough to do. peace & aloha - leebo
A poll from PBS program "NOW" is actually showing that people believe
Palin is qualified! Vote immediately, and pass this on!
You can do this in two clicks – SECONDS! Check this out please, and
fast.
PBS has a poll that asks: Is Sarah Palin qualified to be VP? It shows
that more people are saying YES than NO! Let's turn this around.....
You don't have to give your name or email address in order to vote.
It's very simple.
Here's the link: http://www.pbs. org/now/polls/ poll-435. html
Just click & vote… NOW.
=

Help



